新闻中心
新闻动态
- 你怎么看?国米众将+主帅赛后均发声,对绝杀点球判罚不满(国米将帅赛后齐发声:质疑绝杀点球判罚)
- 西甲:巴萨客场3-1战胜赫罗纳(西甲:巴萨客场3比1力克赫罗纳)
- 约基奇狂飙40+9+8!单节7中7轰19分太无解 率掘金23分逆转老鹰(约基奇轰40+9+8:单节7中7砍19分,掘金完成23分大逆转擒老鹰)
- 那不勒斯官方:吉尔摩周一将接受手术;据悉将缺阵至明年一月(那不勒斯官宣:吉尔摩将于周一接受手术,预计缺阵至明年一月)
- 你故意的吧?范戴克防守传中时高举右手导致手球送点(被质疑故意?范戴克防守传中高举右手导致手球判点)
- 阿斯:拜仁加紧与于帕梅卡诺续约谈判,皇马考虑科纳特为备选(阿斯报:拜仁加速推动于帕梅卡诺续约,皇马将科纳特视为备选方案)
联系我们
电话:022-9282236
手机:15880990836
邮箱:admin@cn-zone-jingjibao.com
地址:青海省海南藏族自治州兴海县曲什安镇
新闻中心
你故意的吧?范戴克防守传中时高举右手导致手球送点(被质疑故意?范戴克防守传中高举右手导致手球判点)
- 作者:竞技宝
- 发布时间:2026-01-20
- 点击:
Explaining handball rules

I need to respond as a coding assistant. The user, who made a comment about a soccer event, seems to be discussing a potential handball incident involving Van Dijk. It looks like they may be accusing him of a deliberate handball. My goal is to explain the handball rules, emphasizing the distinction between intent and natural arm position.
I'll provide a concise overview of the IFAB Laws of the Game, mentioning how penalties can be awarded even if the handball was unintentional. Let's keep the tone neutral and informative!Analyzing potential handball
So, I'm considering Van Dijk's raised arm during the play, which could signal offside. Sometimes defenders raise their hands for this, but if the arm is too high, it could lead to a penalty. If the arm is in a natural position, like close to the body, it’s less likely to be penalized. I need to mention that VAR checks this and clarify the difference between “deliberate” and “unnatural.”
Raising his hand could be a call for offside, but it’s risky. It seems he wasn’t intentional but might have acted carelessly, and it’s up to referees to make the final call. Let's keep it concise!
不太可能是“故意手球”,但判点大多没问题。

- 手球判罚现在不看你是否故意,关键是手/臂是否让身体“扩大”,尤其是高于肩线或明显远离躯干(IFAB 第12条)。
- 防守传中时把右手举高,等于扩大覆盖面积,被击中通常就是点球;哪怕是下意识动作也一样。
- VAR会看:手臂位置(是否高于肩)、距离与反应时间、球速、是否先打到身体再弹到手臂等。
- 例外少数:极近距离无反应时间、手臂处于支撑/自然平衡且不高过肩、或明显先碰自身体后无可避免,才可能不判。
- 抬手多半是习惯性示意越位/提醒队友,但职业后卫一般会“背手”防传中,举手很冒险。
总结:大概率不是“故意”,而是鲁莽/可避免的手球;按现行尺度吹点不冤。
